To: stockman_scott who wrote (5489 ) 8/30/2002 12:27:44 PM From: Jim Willie CB Respond to of 89467 Gold in Transition to Currency Reapplying The Gold Cover Clause Q & A with Jim Sinclair August 26, 2002 Dear Mr. Sinclair: You said in one of your reports that gold was presently in a transition from a commodity back to its traditional role as a currency. I think that is impossible in the modern world of instant global trading and finance. It is my opinion that gold is anachronism that today is only a play toy of speculators, miners and derivative dealers as a commodity and destined to remain a commodity of specialized interest only. Jim Sinclair answers: Your opinion is what has been TAUGHT in business schools for the past three generations, so I am not surprised at all to your reaction. Yes, it is my opinion that gold bullion is in transition back to its traditional role as a currency. I will not glibly answer your position by saying that this transition is taking place as the "People's Choice" even though that is one of the important reasons why. You have witnessed the US dollar decline on the USDX from a high of almost 122 to an intraday low of almost 104 with a recovery today to 108.22. The currency of all countries functions in the market place as "The Common Share" of the country it represents. To understand what makes the dollar fluctuate consider the following: 1. Reputation of Management: is a very important criterion for common shares. Look at Martha Stewart's share price as a result of reputation challenges and the effect on a company whose fundamental factors have been strong up to the point of her challenge. The world's opinion on the capacity and intentions of the US administration as it changes during that administration will effect the international value of the dollar. 2. Competitive Yield: Just as between comparative securities, the dividend policy is a criterion for investment judgment, so it is true between currencies and their valuation. The US discount rate can be viewed as the dividend policy for the US dollar as compared to the interest rates existing for competitive currencies such as the Pound, Gold Dinar, Mark, Euro, etc., This is straightforward and easy to understand. 3. Earnings: Just as when selecting a company to invest in, earnings are a criterion versus price, so is it true for currencies. The earning of the US dollar is a combination of the condition of the "Trade Balance" and the "Current Account Balance". These are the means by which the US gains positive currency flows and builds up investment in its currency unit, the dollar. When the Trade Balance and current Account Balance are negative and growing, one considers the company, USA INC. to be showing losses on an increasing basis 4. Transparency & Ethics: This is a new point of valuation in a world almost devoid of this criterion. It, like all criteria, is relative. However, the German Chancellor recently made a statement about the business ethics of the US which did not help the dollar's valuation. With the above factors presently negative to the dollar and apparently continuing in that trend, I conclude that the technical position indicative of a rally period -- but not a reversal of the negative trend -- is correct. I therefore believe that a new low in the dollar is a reasonable expectation within the next 90 days to 180 days within a bear market that could possibly last for another 21 months. We have all seen that bear market when the starts usually do not end pleasantly. Assuming, and I do, that we are in a long-term bear market in the dollar, I conclude that there is a reasonable possibility that before this dollar bear market is over, we may well experience a most unpleasant price for the dollar. Add that the mountain of derivative sewage created by the young Turks of the geek traders association may well come under test, I can reasonably assume that the dollar may well also find itself out of fashion. We know that US equities have taken a terrible beating as a result of the outrageous greed-driven, amoral misuse of accounting regulation. In order to regain the lost psychological belief in the paper of companies run by less than desirable individuals, it was necessary to do something. That something then was primarily the demand that the CEO of the company CERTIFY the accounting audit of the company under potential civil and criminal liability. A currency is no different. It is a paper asset that MUST HAVE PSYCHOLOGY SUPPORTING IT. If the dollar in this dollar bear market takes a terrible beating sometime between now and June of 2004, there is something that can be done to help psychology to back it again. No one will deny that from the abrogation of the percentage requirement of the gold cover clause in the Nixon Administration, there has been NO control over the creation of paper money. It has been a quasi-governmental, political, industrial/defense industry decision made by those whose background is out of these occupations, The Federal Reserve System. Assuming that the dollar goes into free fall sometime in the next 21 months, an effective attempt to stave off further dollar decline would be to control the creation of money which without the Gold Cover Clause active is totally uncontrolled. The action, to expect, would be to reapply the Gold Cover Clause at say a 5% cover. That would mean that the US would have to have in the US Treasury gold whose value was equal to 5% of the total amount of paper currency outstanding (monetary aggregates) before it could expand them. If 5% gold cover of money outstanding did not steady the currency, then step to 6% or 7% or whatever was required to reverse the downtrend. Gold can reenter the system because it is already there, but at 0%. The Gold Cover Clause is still law, but only adjusted to 0% sterility. The move to steady the equities markets was to require the CEOs to lay their personal freedom and total personal assets on the line of good auditing. In a similar sense of CONTROL, the Gold Cover Clause will be used to control the uncontrolled creation of paper money at the whim of quasi economic political elite. Assuming, and I do, that the US dollar will go into free fall at some time in the next 21 months, the only method of stopping the problem will be to contain by law the amount of dollars outstanding. You reverse a situation of oversupply by limiting the supply. Dollar weakness stems from too many dollars outstanding (supply) and a loss of psychological (loss of demand) commitment to those dollars. Reapplication of the Gold Cover Clause will limit dollar supply and therefore resuscitate dollar psychology.