Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (150687)	8/30/2002 2:23:06 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1585687

There are a lot of theories and a case can be made for each one of them. I tend to go with the one that seems to have the most credibility and support. With all the conflicting or vague or uncertain information I don't think any of the cases has enough evidence to support the idea of taking actions which would cost trillions of dollars. Tim, I disagree.........the greatest support is for the position taken by the EPA. The maverick theories are just that.....maverick and don't have much support outside of the originator of the theory and his/her disciples. There were people who said it was impossible for man to fly and they proved their theories scientifically. If the Wright Bros. listened to them, and made no attempt to build a flying machine, it would still take me three days or so to go visit you. <g> ted