Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clarksterh who wrote (123687)	8/30/2002 5:19:45 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Clark, << Thanks. Note that I'd be willing to bet that those rates never apply near the border between two cells. The advantage of beam shaping and coding changes is that they get you closer to the Shannon rate even at the border of a cell. >> I suspect you are correct. The abstract I furnished came from a draft report of the 3GPP/3GPP2 harmonization meeting on radio access issues that took place in Korpilampi, Finland, on June 25th 2002. Ed Tiedemann of Qualcomm and Francois Courau of Alcatel co-chaired the meeting. Lucent and Nokia as well as Alcatel and Qualcomm were very active in the meeting. The first several pages of the report deal with inputs from the Joint 3GPP 3GPP2 Spatial Channel Modeling Ad Hoc Group, and in discussion Ed Tiedemann questioned if the quasi-static modelling used currently and in the past is still valid for multiple antennas and he also raised the issue of interference from neighboring cells such as including traffic models on the neighboring cells, and how would they impact the channel model used. Unfortunately I don't have the URL for the report immediately available. - Eric -