Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (55971)	8/30/2002 5:25:15 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

Here is something rather funny. see below. I am surprised at how liberal the faculties are- because you know, they don't ask you about politics when they interview you. And the subject rarely comes up in biology or chemistry or math departments at all. I've been a student volunteer in those areas, and politics is something they just don't seem to discuss. The dismal skills of the freshman are always the hottest topic, in any department. So I think you have to wonder, what kind of people are drawn to teaching? Idealists who don't care much about money. Geee....what party are THEY going to be in? ROFL- because at least you have a shot at glamour or a job as a shock jock in journalism. But academia? One Faculty Indivisible Even the press corps isn't this uniformly liberal. Friday, August 30, 2002 12:01 a.m. EDT opinionjournal.com It's hard to think of an ideal propounded with more fervor on our nation's campuses than that of diversity. So it is with more than passing interest that we noticed a new study confirming that when it comes to the political allegiances of college faculties, there is no such animal. Even for those to whom this comes as no news, the study just published in American Enterprise magazine shows a uniformity of political allegiance in major university faculties that is positively breathtaking. The researchers visited Boards of Elections in the areas of 21 colleges or universities, including such institutions as Cornell, Brown, Harvard, Penn State, Stanford, Syracuse, Berkeley, UCLA, the State University of New York at Binghamton and the University of Colorado. They looked at party registration for faculty members in various disciplines. Even discounting that the researchers had only limited registration records in some places, there is little doubt their statistics capture the general political picture. The study divided the parties into right or left: Republican or Libertarian on the right, and Democrat, Green or the like on the left. At Cornell, they found one English Department member in a party of the right as opposed to 35 registered on the left. In the History Department they found no one registered on the right, but 29 on the left. At Harvard, the researchers found one member of the Political Science Department on the right versus 20 on the left. Roughly the same held true for Economics and Sociology. At the University of California at Santa Barbara, close to the Reagan ranch, the ratio across five departments was 72 to one. The nearest thing to a conservative bastion is the Stanford Economics Department, where seven of 28 members (25%!) belong to the right. So it goes for every university in this study. Which leaves us wishing we could know more about the inner lives--and career prospects--of those intrepid one or two registered Republican academics on these campuses. There is, as the study notes, a wider and freer cross- section of opinion in the aisles of any grocery store or city bus than there is now at our colleges and universities. That this lack of faculty diversity eludes university administrators is especially interesting given the totality of their efforts to re-order all other aspects of campus life based on that principle. In the name of this cardinal value, administrators target groups for recruitment, shape curricula, designate some sports for funding in the name of gender equity while cutting others, and so much more. It's virtually impossible to imagine any university president delivering a major address not saturated with references to diversity and his or her own allegiance thereto. We favor diversity too. We simply look forward to the day that college administrators stop preening about the principle long enough to see how little of it exists among the most powerful and influential force on campus--their own teachers.