Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (55976)	8/30/2002 5:22:36 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Here's something you may refuse to see. If CH had so much influence on SI because he is an attorney ... how come JLA wasn't able to influence SI given that he is an attorney? Think about it. There's always the chance that SI called it as they saw it. As others on SI did.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (55976)	8/30/2002 6:16:46 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Just for the record--not that you're interested in facts, but some people here are--there was never any threat or even mention of any suit against SI or anybody else concerning any possible termination from SI. I did demand that SI comply with the terms of its contract with me. I suppose some people think that when you enter into a contract with a corporation it should be free to violate that contract if it chooses to, but I'm not one of them. I now return you to the comfort of your predetermined, fact-free conclusions.