Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (56049)	8/30/2002 10:23:46 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

And apparently you don't know what <bg> means. Slimy smile? So SI was unaware of those? You know that? When they were to many people on this site soon after they were posted- -including me? And you never at any time let SI know you were an attorney- -right in the same state they were headquartered in? Give us a break, CH. How stupid do you think the rest of us are?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (56049)	8/30/2002 10:29:22 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

About threats to sue: You also threatened to sue E's husband if he reported your vile slander of E to the Bar Association in your state. You got the right to continue your cybersexual stalking of Poet solely because of the threat to sue that you knew would come to their attention. The PM from SI to Poet after your IHub threat to sue the informed her that they "had to" rescind the to or about. Not that they had reconsidered and wanted to. They "had to." You sure you want to keep this up? I think your losing.