Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (41105)	8/31/2002 1:09:49 AM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I included it to indicate there is room for anyone to question the veracity of the verifiers. I have no problem presenting points that permit room for doubts about my argument; I'd only present my case as an airtight one if it were. After all, my agenda isn't to prove I'm right, but to say "Look, I've read all the accounts I've been able to find and have distilled it to my opinion." I'll be happy to change my opinion if subsequent verifiable evidence emerges that upholds the stories. It's been a decade, and none has. I still maintain that the evidence is slim about babies in incubators, and the evidence strong that at least a few parties resorted to deliberate deceit in presenting the story. Why persist in making your case about my credibility, as if I were a pollyanna pacifist overlooking obvious truth? I'm merely a government skeptic who questions the official lies told by left and right, because both distort the capacity of many to make informed judgments.