Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FaultLine who wrote (41128)	8/31/2002 3:19:35 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I certainly do not concede it should have been removed in the first place They must of thought so, or they would not have removed it. I am still boiling over the environmental groups pressuring African Countries to refuse our food aid. This is the really slimy behavior, in fact, Criminal, IMO. Children are starving in Africa tonight because of Greenpeace, Earth First, and other groups like them. Just as bad is the behavior of the New York Times and the Washington Post in refusing to report it. The sequence I posted earlier about this, Message 17939162 is clear, and no one has tried to refute it. I know there are a lot of "Environmentalists" on this board who think I am a nut case about this subject. I would love to see them defend this behavior. Do they think that feeding Africans genetically altered food that they themselves are buying in American SuperMarkets is going to hurt the Africans?