To: Ilaine who wrote (41147 ) 8/31/2002 3:29:41 PM From: SirRealist Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 >>They had their story -- the 15-year-old daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US testified without being identified, and therefore she was a liar and the whole story was made up. It's part and parcel of the "hidden agenda" mentality. Everything the government and mainstream media tells you is a lie. You can only trust alternative media and minority political parties.<< #1: Read the book #2: She was coached on what to say, and never visited the hospital, as K&H's VP admitted and it was claimed she could not give her last name because of fears of reprisal against her family. #3: Why didn't they use an actual eyewitness? #4: No, the government never lies, does it? #5: I've worked for the government. My father worked for the USAF. We each have five senses and a brain. #6: 'Everything' is your overstatement. #7: Depends on the alternate media source. Minority political parties? Yeah, right! #8: As medical personnel who worked throughout the war in all maternity and pediatric wards at all Kuwait hospitals that have 'em, were interviewed, you don't find it at all suspicious that NONE supported the accounts? I guess they were all on coffee breaks and their peers forgot to tell them what they missed. #9: I'm sure the Kuwaiti government is even more forthcoming and truthful than our own, right? #10: It is precisely BECAUSE people are trusting the government and major media INSTINCTIVELY that such stories carry weight.washington-report.org globaled.org globaled.org After considering the one nurse you find credible who indicated one baby died in another nurse's arms, and finding out the Ambassador's daughters limited (if at all) contact with one hospital, let's remember her testimony: >>"I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns. They took the babies out of the incubators ... and left the children to die on the cold floor." << One company (Kroll) commissioned by the Kuwaiti government claimed it found one incident in which "perhaps a half dozen" babies were removed from incubators, but provided no evidence to support the claim. Every indendent investigation yielded zero, including investigations by Canadian Broadcast Company and ABC News. As to the rest of the major media, its performance was criticized by another marginal publication of the 'alternative media', the Columbia Journalism Review:cjr.org >>"We became convinced that the story about babies dying in this way did not happen on the scale that was initially reported, if, indeed, it happened at all," said an Amnesty International spokesman.<< Middle East Watch: >>After the liberation of Kuwait, we visited all Kuwaiti hospitals where such incidents were reported to have taken place. We interviewed doctors, nurses and administrators and checked hospital records. We also visited cemeteries and examined their registries. While we did find ample evidence of Iraqi atrocities in Kuwait, we found no evidence to support the charge that Iraqi soldiers pulled babies out of incubators and left them to die. Kuwaiti government witnesses who during the Iraqi occupation asserted the veracity of the incubator story have either changed their stories or were discredited. The propagation of false accounts of atrocities does a deep disservice to the cause of human rights. It diverts attention from the real violations that were committed by Iraqi forces in Kuwait, including the killing of hundreds and the detention of thousands of Kuwait citizens and others, hundreds of whom are still missing." << That bolded part was my original point. I have no doubts about the brutality of the soldiers. When the Kuwaiti government added spin, it was unnecessary, but it is consistent with their wartime propaganda effort. Btw, while working to aid homeless people, I encountered the same sort of spin being employed at the national level by Mitch Snyder's group, as they used the percentage game "the fastest growing group of homeless people is women with children". Sure, if ten become twenty, that's a hundred percent increase. Yet the facts were that over 70% of all homeless people were single men. I opposed that game, but it had its intended effect. Support for the homeless women and children grew tremendously. The problem was, most of the funds that flowed in was spent for that minority, while the majority got meager gleanings. Single men simply aren't viewed with anywhere near similar sympathy. The sympathy support for babies is as good as it gets. Similarly, the postwar reports of Amnesty International about Kuwaiti atrocities drew far less coverage or sympathy:greenleft.org.au And I haven't even begun to mention the credibility of Hill & Knowlton itself, or its connections to many administrations. The VP who coached the Ambassador's daughter went on to an administrative position in the Clinton White House, for the most recent example. And here's a one page backgrounder on H&K that I consider a MUST READ: mediafilter.org If the credulousness of a lot of people exists, it's not because of a love of fiction. It's because a lot of people have been treated like morons by those who lie and once fooled, they remain suspicious, as they should. This is simply the blowback that comes from what governments have done, and those who accept government pronouncements without question are either uninformed, gullible, or consent with the direction the government is headed and simply don't care about the lies.