Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (56135)	8/31/2002 11:52:17 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You did not answer. You didn't even answer the simple question "Insult of whom?" Since in six years on SI the only time anyone on SI heard from me about anything they said to or about me (including after an implied death threat), was in response to CH's connection of me with sadistic porn, I guess I can't think of anything else right now that's on my slander list. It's not as though I haven't had many, many scurrilous things said about me. One difference about CH and others is that he has a history of stalking and sexual obsession (IMO!), so it's best, in cases of very sick people getting you in their sights, to nip the slander in the bud before they make it a habit. Look how long he went on implying, lyingly, that he had PM's of a sexual nature, a special intimate "relationship," and private material about Poet that he would reveal publicly, except that he was above revealing these secrets w/o her permission. It went on until she gave her permission and she, being vulnerable because of PTSD, a fact he knew and exploited, had a sort of emotional collapse for which she had to be treated and from which she had to recover. So I've answered the question. Nobody except an obsessive sicko. (IMO!) In six years, no lies except the obsessive sicko's lies. The obsessive sicko you play kissy-face with all day. Now you answer mine, okay?