Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (52114)	8/31/2002 6:46:02 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

Shack: the b or B down here targets? 8100? then a good C up into November -december to really screw the Bears. But next would have a massive down potentially? I like this scenario a lot.

To: Shack who wrote (52114)	8/31/2002 7:25:11 PM
From: UnBelievable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

In A Zig Zag doesn't Wave B have to be shorter than Wave A, by price, with all internal points considered.

To: Shack who wrote (52114)	9/1/2002 8:45:20 AM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

The scenario you show is the same I mentioned as a “nasty and evil thing” –g. Re-reading my post, I think it still makes sense, but, like many such posts, it is bad literature. Probably the best way to communicate EW scenarios is via a series of pictures. OT: Saw “The tale of the Allergist’s wife” last night. Unabashedly smart and funny, a good play. If you don’t mind dropping $300+ a couple for a simple evening, NYC is still a great town.