SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (22044)9/1/2002 4:06:51 AM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
"OFDMA offers a terrestrial network with more flexibility in the future".

I don't want flexibility. I want the most efficient (i.e. cheap) method of delivering free soft-porn to my WalMart 20".



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (22044)9/1/2002 4:18:35 AM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
"might even cooperate with 4G"

I don't need 4G or OFDM-equipped 4G.



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (22044)9/1/2002 4:20:22 AM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
"adaptable for specific local interferences"

I haven't noticed any problems with my rake fingers. Why do I need this?



To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (22044)9/1/2002 4:31:02 AM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
"However, as we agreed on, cost efficient horsepowers were not there some years ago."

Not aware of anything "cost efficient" in OFDM.

ntsc-tv.com

"Both PAL and SECAM require somewhat more complex receivers and have somewhat lower
vertical color resolution, but highly satisfactory reception is achieved by each system."

Simple and elegant challenged?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News