Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (41348)	9/1/2002 11:59:31 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Ralph Peters has an interesting new essay in Parameters, Rolling Back Radical Islam He pretty much says that the Arab heartland is totally f--ked up, we should concentrate on influencing affairs in the non-Arab Muslim population centers, such as Malaysia and Indonesia: We have been looking in the wrong direction, because that is where we have been conditioned to look. This great battle—this war for the future of one of the world’s great religions (and, certainly, its most restive and unfinished)—is not being fought in the Arab homelands, which insist upon our attention with the temper of spoiled children, distracting us from better prospects elsewhere. The contest between competing Muslim visions, between those who would turn back the clock and those who believe they must embrace the future, has already been lost in the sands of Arabia. Fortunately, the Arab homelands are far less critical than our policymakers and strategists unthinkingly believe. Blinded by oil and riveted by the Arab-Israeli conflict, leaders and legislators alike have failed to reexamine their thinking for the past 40 years. Now we must change our beliefs and our behaviors. It is time to write off the Arab homelands of Islam as lost. They are as incapable of constructive change as they are un- 5/6 willing even to consider liberal transformations. They have been left behind by history and their response has been to blame everyone but themselves—and to sponsor terror (sometimes casually, but often officially). Much of the Arab world has withdrawn into a fortress of intolerance and self-righteousness as psychologically comfortable as it is practically destructive. They are, through their own fault, as close to hopeless as any societies and cultures upon this earth. Of course, we need not call back our ambassadors from the Middle East, nor could we cease dealing with the oil states entirely. But it is time to shift our focus and our energies, to recognize, belatedly, that Islam’s center of gravity lies far from Riyadh or Cairo, that it is in fact a complex series of centers of gravity, each more hopeful than the Arab homelands. On its frontiers, from Detroit to Jakarta, Islam is a vivid, dynamic, vibrant, effervescent religion of changing shape and gorgeous potential. But Islam’s local identities are far from decided in its struggling borderlands, and, in times of tumult, any religion can turn toward the darkness as easily as toward the light. We should make no mistake: This struggle between religious forms, between prescriptive, repressive doctrine and the sublime adventure of faith, is one of the two great strategic issues of our time—along with the redefinition of the socio-economic roles of women, their transition from being the property of men to being equal partners with men (which is the most profound social development in human history). The United States will never be the decisive factor in the struggle for the future of Islam. That role is reserved for Muslims themselves. But we can play a far more constructive role than we have yet done—usually on the margins, but sometimes from within unfinished societies. Until now, we have not even bothered to participate. carlisle-www.army.mil

To: D. Long who wrote (41348)	9/1/2002 12:01:41 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well, the biggest thing the US could do in that regard is be an honest broker in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict rather than being jerked around by Sharon. The second biggest thing is to push human rights arguments seriously with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, et al. The third biggest thing would be to be much more precise in our language as to who is the target of our efforts and why. The language of "terrorists" is self defeating because, as B says, it's so ahistorical, and rather than telling our listeners we have reasonably precise reasons for fairly precise targets, just renews the stereotypes about the arrogant US. Sure John. We'll just import em all to the US for a good round of K-12, a suitcase full of cash, and a copy of the Bill of Rights, and send em back. The fourth biggest thing would be to make use of the soon to be evacuated Enron headquarters in Houston, which, no doubt is near your office, to run seminars. You can be the first up. ;-))