Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (56317)	9/1/2002 2:27:07 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

. Frankly, I'm trying to permanently delete as much as I can about the details of this issue from my memory. So much negativity is not healthy. Would that everyone were so wise.

To: Lane3 who wrote (56317)	9/1/2002 3:09:31 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

If you felt that the behaviors in Part One deserved only a "tepid" response, I can see that those Part Two participants who felt the behaviors were, shall we say, untepidly condemnable, and argued their case to you, would seem "unattractive" to you. I'm sorry if I was among those who you felt "peppered you" with PM's, and I'll be more careful in the future about both tone and content. I did let it all hang out when talking to you, that's true. I suspect from what you write that X's comments are mostly based on your reports to her about those who wrote to you. The subject is now how you got peppered with pleading or otherwise discomfiting PM's, and that Rambi, whose first name I used, got one phone call, and that iyo and X's, that is as "unattractive" as what CH did to Poet and others. I assume you engaged in PM's with X and possibly others in CH's camp, but they were of a different tone--one more congenial to you. That would be only natural, of course.