Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (41417)	9/1/2002 4:47:15 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

As I read this, you now admit that Bush has the legal grounds to invade. You just don't think he has enough political support. I think we are making progress with you. So, now you are making up positions for me. I gather you've run out of reasons to attack my real positions. Restated. The Bush lawyers have to find grounds on which to argue Saddam was "harboring" Al Q or is such before they can get close to a legal argument that makes their case. Now carranza, who decided he best not argue that position, decided he would back away from it. Bush faces constitutional and political problems if he goes forward on Iraq without congressional consent.