SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (41568)9/2/2002 2:24:05 PM
From: BigBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Fascinating interview with PUK's leader - Jalal Talabani.

The whole interview is definitely worth reading but this section really caught my attention:

puk.org

Q. But what is the next step exactly?

A. The next step is to convene a conference for the Iraqi opposition. A steering committee , representing the six organizations, will undertake this task.

Q. Where will it be held?

A. Perhaps in Europe or in liberated Iraqi Kurdistan if we can obtain appropriate American security guarantees.

Q. Have you obtained them?

A. Last Wednesday the State Department reaffirmed the protection for the Kurdish region. And Vice-President Dick Cheney has reaffirmed protection for the Kurds. If there are sufficient guarantees, then we prefer to hold the meeting on the home soil rather than holding in America or a foreign country.

Q. What is the timeline?

A. It should be held within a month.

Q. Will the conference be restricted to the six sides you referred to ?

A. No. No. The steering committee will invite other sections of Iraqi opposition who subscribe to the declared common manifesto, of a democratic, parliamentary and independent Iraq, to attend the conference. The outline of our general agenda will be tabled at the conference for deliberation. It is expected that about one hundred representatives of parties and personalities will participate in the forthcoming conference.



To: Ilaine who wrote (41568)9/2/2002 4:43:16 PM
From: FaultLine  Respond to of 281500
 
getting her facts from the enemy

I think you forgot your grinnie...

BTW, several of us routinely post items reflecting multiple points of view. In many cases, posting should not necessarily imply agreement unless specifically indicated.

--fl



To: Ilaine who wrote (41568)9/2/2002 7:31:41 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
That was a Reuter's article from MSN homepage. Now that you know, would you consider them an enemy newsource?