Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (146619)	9/2/2002 9:22:08 PM
From: Bill Harmond	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

>>We don't need a coalition. Victor, I disagree with you on this. We may not need a coalition to win a war, but we sure need one if we want peace afterwards. The US can't step out now and move at will without international consensus. We'd be asking for outlaw status. You think they hate us now...

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (146619)	9/2/2002 11:34:29 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Why not invade and "liberate" Pakistan? Iran? Saudi Arabia?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (146619)	9/12/2002 9:55:50 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 164684

>> I'm suprised you are so disdainful of the Iraqi people, and misjudge them so. Do they not have human rights?? << they will value their rights much more if they fight for them like my forefathers did. what gives america the right to go abroad enforcing our view of human rights on the entire world? you are making the same foolish arguments the colonial powers made. they were out to civilize the world. get a clue. our founding fathers fought for independence, not to become another british empire imposing our view of human rights on the world. not so we would become embroiled in the endless wars of europe. try learning some u.s. history on your lunch break.