SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SirRealist who wrote (41650)9/3/2002 2:42:09 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Another article about the planned Media coverage of 9/11 anniversary. from "Weekly Standard." Not for the "PC challenged."

A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, my colleague Richard Starr had a genius idea: On the morning of September 11, one of the networks should re-air, in full, its original broadcast from a year ago.

Yes, there would be a few embarrassing moments as the anchors reported developments that we now know weren't true. Yes, it would be painful--perhaps even hurtful--to people who lost friends and loved ones. Yes, it would preclude the broadcast of live memorial events that have been planned. But it would avoid sappiness and melodrama and, with any luck, help stiffen the national spine by reminding us that we are not recovering from a tragedy, we are engaged in a war.

Alas, no one is taking Richard's suggestion, and if the September 11 programming schedule is to be trusted, the Princess Dianafication of America is proceeding apace. Gary Levin of USA Today reports that ABC will highlight a town-hall meeting called "Answering Children's Questions." CBS will run "The Day That Changed America." Fox will air a special called "The Day America Changed" and a taped town-hall meeting. CNN will have 12 hours of Aaron Brown and Paula Zahn anchoring under the banner "America Remembers." NBC, also using the slogan "America Remembers," will feature six hours of the "Today Show" and another town-hall meeting with survivors, rescuers, and victim's families.

These broadcasts promise to be long on grieving and short, as they say, on root causes. Two weeks ago Michael Starr reported in the New York Post that the actual images of the attack--the planes striking and the towers collapsing--will barely be shown. Thom Bird of Fox News Channel explains, "We've decided to use that image [of the planes] in conjunction with the time it actually happened a year ago, and then you'll never see it again that day." A spokeswoman from NBC News said that they will use "extreme discretion" in showing these important images at both NBC and MSNBC. ABC News president David Westin told Michael Starr that his network has a policy of not showing the footage of the planes or the tower collapse, but that he'll "slightly modify" that policy for the anniversary.

This first anniversary promises to fill our screens with crying widows, lists of names, and commemorative concerts. But by not highlighting the footage of the attack, the networks are giving us grief, not purpose; sorrow, not resolve.

And this difference is the danger we now confront. If September 11 becomes a mere tragedy, something we mourn and grieve, then the war on terrorism becomes a symbolic war, like the war on poverty or illiteracy or drugs. If we are serious about ridding the world of terrorists, then September 11 is a starting point, a raw reminder to an increasingly complacent America that Freedom is not free. We need to remember not just the people we lost, but the threat we face
weeklystandard.com