Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:36:53 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

LUNATIC LIBELER, TP, CONTINUES INSANE RAMPAGE Message 17952283

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:35 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has an bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:38 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has an bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:43 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has an bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:45 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has any bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:45 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has any bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:46 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has any bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (293065)	9/4/2002 2:53:47 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

So there is possible misconduct among various Enron affiliates, and a couple of unrelated companies. I am shocked, just shocked! (Yawn). The leap is to assume that it has any bearing on the Administration. Most of this alleged malfeasance occurred under the previous Administration, and it has been demonstrated that Clinton was very cozy with Enron. Nevertheless, I would not be so stupid as to say that the article provided evidence against Clinton, and you should know better than to use it to bash Bush......