Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fedhead who wrote (13786)	9/4/2002 6:47:16 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57684

14:44 ET Symantec: positive comments from CSFB (SYMC) 29.93 +2.26: -- Update -- CSFB believes that the consumer side of SYMC's biz is beating internal expectations, leaving firm with a high degree of confidence in the current qtr; in addition, CSFB believes SYMC is gaining share in the enterprise anti-virus mkt, and that the co's enterprise strategy is resonating with customers. Maintains Buy rating and $42 price target.

To: fedhead who wrote (13786)	9/4/2002 11:58:01 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 57684

Problem is stocks are still absurdly valued in spite of the length of the bear market. Only if you think things will never improve (and, in some cases they may not). By other metrics, stocks today are trading just as they have in most recessions. Stocks were expensive in 91, the difference between the ones I followed then vs. now is now the companies have a ton of cash. I don't remember anybody ringing the bell in 91/92 saying the bottom was in for stocks either, it seems to me there was a lot of barking about how expensive things were then, too. Real estate, otoh is something I want to stay away from. L