Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (146990)	9/5/2002 1:23:36 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

OK, but he wouldn't accept any of that as evidence of a present danger. No offense, but I doubt you have the proof of a present danger that would satisfy Congress, much less GST, even if it is enough to satisfy you and others. Leave it to the President to make the case. If he can't, I'm sure we will hear from Daschle, Gephart et al.

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (146990)	9/5/2002 1:42:39 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 164684

Bill: Nobody in the Bush adminstration has made the case that the "danger" posed by Iraq warrants an invasion. Bush will no doubt try to make that case now. It will not be an easy case to make -- contrary to what you seem to think. Few people in the world are inclined to buy it. And we don't know how well he will make it. I was just wondering if you had a clue as to the logic he will use -- it seems you don't and prefer to be an a$$ than to have a conversation. An intelligent conversation seems out of the question. Good luck.