SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (18316)9/5/2002 4:19:09 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27666
 
>Would it fit a cost/benefit ratio to euthanize our old folks to keep healthcare costs down as well?<

No it would not...Seiors are big spenders and will be more so as the demographics show. They also keep the pharmaceuticals in the black with all the drugs they consume



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (18316)9/5/2002 4:22:48 PM
From: seismic_guru  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27666
 
If your using that as a justification, why not just bomb hanoi off that map at the start of the vietnam war, could have saved lots of US lives. I guess we could just bomb Baghdad into obvilion as well? One nuke a whole lot cheaper than waging a ground war.



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (18316)9/5/2002 4:45:33 PM
From: hal jordan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27666
 
What in the world are you talking about?

>>Would it fit a cost/benefit ratio to euthanize our old folks to keep healthcare costs down as well?<<

How does this tie into anything.