Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (42273)	9/6/2002 1:41:28 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 281500

seem to believe that if Israel would have traded the West Bank and Gaza to an Arab entity, in toto, in 67 or after Oslo Well, Derek, since I've only mentioned about 10 times on this board that Levi Eshkol did offer the land back in return for a peace treaty in 1967 and got the three no's of the Khartoum conference -- no recognition. no negotiation. no peace -- it seemed kind of useless to point it out one more time.

To: D. Long who wrote (42273)	9/6/2002 9:03:48 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Derek, We've all been up one side and down the other on these issues. My guess is that we are all tired of saying the same things to one another. I know I am. As I recall, my post was simply to restate my historical sense given some sort of debate about the present. I don't now recall exactly what that was. No doubt, yet another assertion that the Palestinians only wanted to drive the Israelis into the sea or that ending the occupation would only have given Arafat ammunition with which to do so. But I vote to stop those conversations for a while, at least. No doubt something will come up that will make them relevant again.