Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wolff who wrote (170734)	9/6/2002 4:23:48 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Wolff, Re: "I think claiming "feelings" now is a a little silly considering your tone." I don't think I mentioned anyone's "feelings" in my post. Why don't you take your own advice and read what I said again: Message 17962375 . I think continuing your argument now is a little "silly", given that no one agrees with you, and people have had to repeat that sentiment as many times as you have tried to stress yours. wbmw

To: Wolff who wrote (170734)	9/6/2002 10:32:25 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

I said your "Novel Idea" which refered to your post, read what you said again Message 17961580 I think claiming "feelings" now is a a little silly considering your tone. I like your "inbred clique" characterization. I could not have said it better. You must realize that wanna is one of the resident certified Intel stooges. Intel even has engineers (Tench) camped out on these threads to counter any negative flak. Look at wanna's posting record.....7 days a week.....morning, noon, and night.... weekdays, weekends, and holidays. It's all Intel...all the time. So... if you make a half dozen posts, which, in any way disparages Intel, well....you must be escorted off the thread. Meanwhile, he is free to post ad infinitum with repetitive Intel FUD, which, quite frankly, bores me to tears. THE WATSONYOUTH P.S. I agree with you that Barrett runs his mouth without thinking. He should have a canned say nothing/feel good response for such situations. But, I hardly think it is worth removing him over it.