Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (57050)	9/6/2002 4:20:16 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"I have no idea why a name is a stalker. But that seems to be what you are saying" It was you who claimed to believe that Bill was referring to a name...and you were "glad it was only that". This is what you said: "But as I understand you, it was merely an opinion about stalking, as regards an alias. I am so glad it was only that" I said that it was nonsensical to believe that Bill was referring to a name rather than a biological entity. How in the Hell could a name stalk somebody! If you care to remember, Bill had voiced the opinion that CH was a stalker. Do you still think that he meant (or that I take him to mean)--that a name is a biological entity?? ;-) You know, I could put this into a syllogistic formula to make it clearer. Would you like me to do that? I do have time.