Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (548)	9/7/2002 2:12:28 AM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8683

GZ if that would not stop Sadam then he is really insane.... -Albert ps I still believe that likelihood of using any nuclear devices is zero.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (548)	9/7/2002 9:53:01 AM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

"...But if a missile did penetrate Israel's defences and if it carried a chemical or biological cargo, the sources said Israel would retaliate by using a neutron bomb... Iraq has admitted to producing weapons using anthrax, botulinum, and aflatoxin agents as well as mustard gas, the nerve gas sarin and VX gas, a highly persistent nerve agent. The Pentagon estimates that Iraq bias between 80 and 100 biological weapons sites, more than 100 chemical weapons sites and about 20 nuclear sites despite years of international inspections." Welcome to the brave new world... What is the opposite of "Live and let live"?