Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PLAYFAIR MINING - PLY . V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumell who wrote (492)	9/8/2002 10:56:14 PM
From: hank2010	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 505

". There was a lot of it on Muskox. When a few people like Robbins, King or myself politely questioned it, response was less than positive....LOL." I remember your questioning in particular, Bob. My response was to sell half of my holdings. I am still very grateful to you for having posted, as I got all my money out and then hung on to the other half until after it plummeted. In regards to the deep gravity anomaly, I questioned on the other board if it was likely that the oxidation and erosion of the soft sulphides would result in a "valley" in the bedrock. My thinking was that the top of the gravity anomaly would be at the top of an eroded bedrock surface and could still be the source of the surface geochem. Got no response however.