Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (15178)	9/9/2002 8:51:25 AM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45639

Most of us in WI feel that Freeman's big contract had him being grossly over paid. At the end of the contract most of us felt he perhaps owed us a little loyalty because of that. He felt differently so there are some very hard feelings when we speak of that little prick:)

To: LTK007 who wrote (15178)	9/9/2002 11:01:16 AM
From: C	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 45639

For you to say...... <<You are a lesser team with Glenn there and Freeman gone.>> .....is not in any way accurate. Freeman is probably number 4 on the Packers depth chart if still in Green Bay. "IF" healthy is a phrase that has to qualify any players hopes for a good season in the NFL. Such as.....the Eagles can have a good season "if" McNabb stays healthy. I have seen enough of Glenn so far to know that he is a difference maker. His hands, speed, and WR knowledge gives the Packers options that they haven't had in some time. The "other" wide-outs for the Packers are going to have big years because of Terry Glenn. Look for J. Walker to be in the top three running for rookie of the year. The Patriots are glad to be rid of Glenn and the Packers are glad to have him. Sounds like everyone should be happy. I know I am. C