SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (170847)9/10/2002 1:18:07 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Joe, Re: "Have you read a reasonable explanation of Intel/BapCo actions?"

Funny you should mention this, since very few developments have arisen on this issue since last time you confronted me on it. Realworldtech has yet to publish their complete findings on the matter, but so far, I happen to agree with Paul DeMone's short note here.

realworldtech.com

Anand hasn't published his article, either, and I have been waiting to hear Anand's opinion.

So far, the whole Intel/Bapco "disaster" hasn't seemed to have left a lasting mark on the industry. I also note that most reviewers continue to use SysMark 2002, even in their most recent reviews.

tomshardware.com

wbmw



To: Joe NYC who wrote (170847)9/10/2002 3:37:04 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Joe, <Have you read a reasonable explanation of Intel/BapCo actions?>

No, but I'm wondering why Anand started using SYSMark 2002 again:

anandtech.com

Tenchusatsu