Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NITT who wrote (170934)	9/10/2002 10:53:15 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"The issue is intellectual property rights. If digital content cannot be protected, then one of two things happen: 1)People don't waste their time investing in new things 2)Honest people pay more than they should have to. The argument that we have been able to copy content all along is a weak one when you look at how easy and fast content can be copied and distributed... and it's only going to get easier and faster without some kind of protection." --------------- Sure, but is it Intels responsibility to be the policeman for the RIAA and the MIAA? I don't thinks its too wise for Intel to put themselves in the middle like that. Something tells me that some of this security won't make Intel chips real popular with a lot of people. Intel should give people what they want not worry about being a policeman. But they are just 15 year old kids right? RE:"My take in the music industry is that if artists could control their content then many would be willing to bypass the very inefficient distribution network that is in place today. They could go direct to the consumer. Would some choose to screw you anyway, yes, but we would have access to so much more content that market forces would prevail. "Bad" artists would be punished by the marketplace if they got out of hand. In the software world, if MS used it to jack up prices, then others would step in and corporations and consumer groups would lead the charge to replace MS. The bottom line is MS could probably lower prices a bit and still get revenue growth if everyone was kept honest (no I don't think they will actually lower prices without a real competitive threat)." I dunno what the solution is but I believe either the RIAA adapts or they go down. Things change and those who change with them adapt or perish. Shoot, look at ATT and what they used to charge us for telephone calls. Now they have competition and also E-mail and VOIP. Are you crying for ATT? Jim