SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:21:36 AM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 436258
 
it's imperialistic at its root, we shouldn't kid ourselves about that part of it.



To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:23:32 AM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
Once we have defeated Iraq, will we have to stay there one year, ten years, or perhaps longer?

Maybee but we will have lots of oil dollars to support that ocupation.



To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:24:39 AM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
Shortly, we will expand NATO to include a large number of eastern European nations. Will our armed forces to have to stay in western and/or eastern Europe for another 50 years?

Frankly I believe America should withdrawl from NATO, as it is just a way to subsidise competing nations. There is no external threat in Europe are job is done.



To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:25:51 AM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
A further question connected to the previous one - referring to our forces in Japan and in South Korea. We have been in Japan since 1945 and in South Korea since 1950. Will our forces stay there permanently? This is asked since we are now expanding NATO.

Actually Japan pays 80% of the cost of US troops protecting them. Korea's protection is still nescesary.



To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:27:26 AM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
Keeping the three above questions in mind, can you, Mr. President, foresee any time in the future when the United States has fewer foreign engagements than we do at present, given the fact that all such engagements place a great internal burden upon all Americans?

I am the first to believe that The USA should only direct their resources towerds vital areas, and should withdraw out of Europe. However ASIA's high tech components and ME oil are the two areas that are Vital to US security.



To: Rarebird who wrote (191455)9/11/2002 11:28:26 AM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
is widely reported that we are now building permanent facilities for our armed forces not only in Afghanistan but in all the other "stans", except one. How long do our armed forces have to stay there, right in the middle of Central Asia?

Agree this is very STUPID.

Hope I lived up to your high intelectual standard.