Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (20630)	9/11/2002 11:51:16 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

The Bush supporters to whom RD is referring would be terrorists in the pay of Bush supporters, of course.

To: Bill who wrote (20630)	9/11/2002 11:59:48 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 21057

You want a real answer to that? You aren't going to like it. Given gov't support (which, in E's interpretation, is implied) Bush's supporters. The US gov't has lots and lots of various forms of nuclear material an conventional explosives right here in the US of A. They've lost track of the stuff before. They could just "lose track of" some more and slip it to an outside group that then pretend to be terrorists and build and explode a bomb. This takes a conspiracy within the gov't. But it could be done. Genuine terrorists, OTOH, have to get the materials, get them into the US, get them assembled and to the right place and exploded. Remember, the US gov't insisted for DECADES that the Warren Report was right. Until it decided it wasn't. And now what happened in that incident in Dallas is murky. Gov't involvement is hardly impossible. Think the US gov't doesn't engage in very shady things? How about those untreated syphilis experiments in the South? What about dosing people with radioactive materials without their knowledge or consent in the early '50s?