Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRI who wrote (191489)	9/11/2002 12:50:28 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 436258

<<...I still think we'd be better off exacting continued inspections- which our allies are willing to support (w/no limits where they can go.....buffered by a UN-led armed force to accompany inspectors....palaces no longer off limits, etc.). If Saddam refuses, then I think you get a U.S.-led world coalition war, and everyone (politically happy)...>> JRI: I tend to agree with you...yet, for some reason the NeoCon Warhawks in the Bush Admin. (like Cheney and Rumsfeld) want to pre-empt and go to war with Iraq...period...with OR without allies. IMO, that will be very dangerous and The U.S. would be setting a precedent that others might follow...Its much more desireable to work with The U.N. and The Security Council to clamp down on Iraq / Saddam and focus on meaningful disarmament.