SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Digital Photography -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Done, gone. who wrote (3341)9/11/2002 2:27:15 PM
From: Crocodile  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21665
 
Actually, I may well look into one. Seriously. It puts a real cramp on the "enjoyment factor" when you're constantly worried about your camera equipment. People are always saying "Why don't you keep your camera in a seal bag?" but that's not a great solution. By the time you get the camera out and ready to shoot, the object you were going to shoot is long gone. I usually keep my little Kodak sitting an open insulated lunch bag right by my feet, where I can pick it up in a second's notice. I have a DVcam in another lunch bag beside it..always "set" to go..and I get some great clips of Ospreys flying over the canoe, and other things. Only problem is the ever-present possibility of the equipment ending up in the river. I'm a pretty good paddler, so I have a high risk tolerance, but that would definitely change if I started packing a super expensive camera. It's a problem. But an underwater housing is definitely something to consider. hmmm!!!