Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (57629)	9/11/2002 2:27:15 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Ah, so some disease is sacred and some isn't. So, if he had AIDS, you'd still make fun of him... Where do I go to look this up.. or do you make it up as you go?

To: jlallen who wrote (57629)	9/11/2002 4:24:42 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

ROFL So you have to change what you say about people if they by chance get a disease? That doesn't seem very logical. Wouldn't be nice to make fun of them because they HAVE the disease- but I have no idea why you have to change your pre-disease opinions about them. We'll just have to pray Clinton doesn't get Alz or cancer- I doubt you'd be up to your own standard. And why not VD? Is it because there is some moral stigma attached to it? What if he got it from a toilet seat? Or was raped? If it wasn't his fault could it count?