Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Scariest Dude On SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (184)	9/11/2002 7:55:36 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 282

I'm interpreting your post to mean that your interpretation of E's interpretation of RD's interpretation of events exists on an equal plain with your interpretation of GZ's interpretation of RD's interpretation of the news. Yes?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (184)	9/11/2002 8:21:33 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 282

As I said, it was framed (imo) with the intention of riling up those with poor reading comprehension, and it did so. But what the message SAYS, as opposed to how it can be MISREAD by the halt, is absolutely clear. You might want to argue that RD wants Bush and his supporters, with the help of the Supreme Court Justices (overlook that he calls them 'Injustices') to declare martial law, and you would have some substance to argue. But I don't believe you think RD wants that. He is not reputed to be a Bush fan, for example; he refers to the resultant society as 'heinous,' for another. There are other hints that the result of the dirty nuke will not be a society congenial to him. Is it your view that RD wants Bush to rule, and him to live under Republican martial law? Because for your "interpretation" (which is in fact merely misreading) to make the least sense, you have to believe that. Her interpretation and the interpretation that it is a threat are both just that- -interpretations. Yes. One that fits the text, one that's laughable.