SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Chen who wrote (147313)9/13/2002 2:41:09 AM
From: craig crawford  Respond to of 164684
 
>> Buschman,re:"perhaps for John Chen". Craig is a source of historic views, abeit sometimes radical and even on the border of 'nut' as you put it <<

some of my views only seem radical in the present age of radical liberalism. a century ago or perhaps even a half-century ago they were not radical at all. i am curious to hear just what views of mine you think are nuts. for example, just a half century ago president eisenhower launched "operation wetback" to address the hordes of illegal mexican immigrants pouring in over the border. can you imagine the uproar that would follow president bush launching an "operation wetback II"?

TODAY'S LETTER: A Reader Remembers Operation Wetback; Even If National Review Doesn't
vdare.com

National Review neocon John J. Miller writes (“Illegal Amnesty? Bush’s Decision Poses Problems, But Also Promise,” Investor’s Business Daily, July 26, 2001): “Short of a Gestapo-like deportation effort, the millions of illegal aliens living in this country are here to stay.”

I guess that Miller must consider President Eisenhower to have been a Nazi. In 1954, when the country first faced massive illegal immigration from Mexico, Ike’s “Operation Wetback” successfully rounded up and deported huge numbers of illegal aliens and brought the border under control. See Alien Nation, by Peter Brimelow, page 34, Chart 3.

At the time, the neocons were still Communists and consequently unable to dictate the policies of a Republican administration, and William F. Buckley’s magazine, as they do today.