Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (43446)	9/12/2002 11:34:29 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The burden of proof should be on Saddam Thats the point. "We don't need no stinking Badge" to go in with all of his UN resolution violations.

To: Ilaine who wrote (43446)	9/15/2002 8:02:20 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

That's new-era Washington-style hardball. Why give away anything when you don't have to? The burden of proof should be on Saddam to prove that he's complied with the UN resolutions. Well, that's arguable. But even more arguable is why this is now a major cause of the Bush administration. Sort of makes you wonder what sort of foreign policy he has if he moves, so easily, from invasion justification to invasion justification in search of one that will stick. Let's see, we've had ties to Al Q, put down your wmd, change the regime, evil guy, represses people, and now violates UN resolutions. All of which are true but none seem to be the real reason. Wonder what it is?