SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (43496)9/12/2002 1:46:54 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
He's one sharp guy...tearing apart all the arguments from the interviewer in a credible and diplomatic way

Scott Ritter has changed his story 180 degrees since three years ago, has admitted to taking Iraqi money, is saying something totally opposite to every other weapons inspector and Iraqi defector, and has travelled to Baghdad three times on Saddam Hussein's dime to proclaim Saddam Hussein's innocence. These facts are not in dispute.

So tell me, why do you find him credible?



To: stockman_scott who wrote (43496)9/12/2002 2:21:10 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
would love to debate his former boss Richard Butler...=)

You mean the same guy to whom Scott Ritter was reporting Iraqi INTRANSIGENCE towards weapons inspectors??

The same to whom Ritter reported that there existed a continued threat from Iraqi WMDs??

I trust Butler more than I do Ritter.

Hawk


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News