Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (20739)	9/12/2002 3:22:20 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I will not try to disentangle the time line. Since you have defended inflammatory language,that is irony enough......

To: Bill who wrote (20739)	9/12/2002 3:43:07 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I did find this, about 10 and a half hours before E made her faux pas: Win teased GZ about repetitive posts, then you jumped in with--- Get lost, you traitor. Hey Poet, that's what I was talking about. Message 17973554

To: Bill who wrote (20739)	9/12/2002 4:12:47 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

I personally called nobody a traitor or an asshole before said respectful debate was ended by E. I beg to differ. Because it's untrue. Of course I'm only puke, so you might dismiss my comments. Just a couple of items: Posted at about noon, from you, in response to WS protesting the content of GZ's post and the spamming of it: Get lost, you traitor. Message 17973554 Eleven hours later, my first contribution, in response to poster who erroneously accused another poster of making a bomb threat: He did not, you asshole. Message 17976055 Later, I said I was sorry. Please retract your above inaccurate statement and apologize.