Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (20755)	9/12/2002 3:40:33 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Respond to of 21057

GZ began the debate by posting this (on numerous threads): Message 17972442 Win Smith was the first to respond negatively, by labelling GZ's post as spam and suggesting that GZ lacked reading comprehension skills: Message 17973505 In the very next post, you called Smith a "traitor": siliconinvestor.com GZ then responded with this little nugget: "Spam? You're head is still up your ass, this is a public service, you moron... why are you trying to protect a traitor?" Message 17974606 Up until that point, E hadn't been heard from. At 11:00 p.m. on September 10, she made her first contribution to the discussion, directed at GZ's original post about Duray and saying "He did not, you asshole" (meaning the post did not advocate the nuking of the Capitol). Message 17976579 Since you desire more specific admonishments, I would say that they are due to GZ and E up to that point. I think you'll agree that you rolled up your pant legs and waded into the sewer after that point. You can decide whether that deserves an admonishment or a Scout Badge of Honor. BTW, your definition of a non sequitur must be a lot different than mine.