SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rollcast... who wrote (191726)9/12/2002 4:27:10 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
...and cheney was paid milions by haliburton, so i guess there isn't credibility on either side of the issue...



To: Rollcast... who wrote (191726)9/12/2002 4:36:01 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<<..., I "selectively" used the fact that Ritter was paid $400,000 by a proven Iraqi sympathizer to show that he is not credible...>>

Hmmm...What you failed to mention was that the 'sympathizer' actually is a U.S. citizen and a Detroit businessman who did NOT pay Scott Ritter...he made a $400,000 contribution to a movie on Iraq that Ritter was producing...This businessman had NO input on the content and Ritter used outside auditors to review how all the funds were accounted for. Lets remember that Ritter is a former Marine, a Republican and has voted for Bush before. He's hardly got a left-wing agenda to prove. He does clearly disagree with the way Bush and Cheney are dealing with Iraq. He is in favor of working through The UN and motivating Iraq to allow new unrestricted weapons inspections.

Watch The O'Reilly Factor interview tonight and gather some additional facts BEFORE you jump to conclusions and judge Ritter's credibility.

regards,

-Scott