Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark calgary who wrote (4195)	9/13/2002 10:41:24 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

You arrogant paranoid backwater prairie hick...... ---- Great name calling. No data nothing just name calling. --- I provided real trading data that you can trade a trust. ---- YOU PROVIDED NOTHING. You make such a grandiose gesture. Thats not what is need is. """"Post those to the board here""""" IF YOU LIKE. MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO ALL. Then I and others can check my data sources as described to see if they are indeed correct. Then detail as I have done your method / strategy (math) that we may all forward test it with the ongoing data. Much like many have done with mine with my on going posts. To see if it holds. Now as I said I accumulate on weakkness according to a model that I gave out that all can test. PROVIDE THE SAME. IF YOU CANT. THEN WHAT YOU SHOW MEANS NOTHING. ITS THAT SIMPLE. Recently in a recent post I explained that very same strategy of mine to Scott Mc. He said he understood ,that it was simple enough. DELIVER THE SAME. YOU WON'T. That tells all how well you do and how well it works. ----- Saying you do it by magic like Lorne and it works all the time. Is just talk. Deliver a method that can be tested and verified with not just the past data but can be examined with real time follow through. Now anyone can use the past data to come up with something that works. Thats all hindsight. But do as I did when NCF came down to $10 with the worldcom fallout was happening I said I was accumulating. Lorne laughed and said that since I bought first at $18 I had a 80% loss. I said by buying lower I was reducing my average cost and when it recovered I would again be in positive ground. That all happened (as I said it would and I did that well before the fact) just recently as forward follow through confirmation (realtime) . I said my average cost was under $12 the price of NCF real time afterward (just days) went above that $12. Provide the same. YOU CAN"T. ALL there is of record from you in these past postings is not buy and sells we all can verify with the past trading data but insults to me.----- ---- So to summarize anyone who is legit in their statements would provide not only real trust past trading data. They would provide a method a strategy (math) of how it works. ONLY I DO THAT. BEAT THAT IF YOU CAN WITH THE SAME. I ASK FOR WHAT I DELIVER NO MORE NO LESS. ----

To: mark calgary who wrote (4195)	9/13/2002 10:54:22 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Peter it is so sad to see you argue with such vengance against people that you share a common interest with - ie. the trusts. Perhaps we should all view this link and take it to heart - YOU ESPECIALLY !!!! ---- What is sad is that you can only really deliver attacks of a personal nature or name calling. NO TRUST DATA. I demand from others what I deliver. Note Lorne was asked to deliver some data to Bill (by BILL) to show how stripping worked in that case he never did. I have already delivered examples of how my method worked with EIT just recently. And in the past with NCF, ERF, PWI. All with real trust trading data. What those examples showed of low ranges to accumulate at proved to be correct --------- Apologies to all in advance, this is not meant to be a putdown of those pictured, just a wakeup call.

To: mark calgary who wrote (4195)	9/13/2002 11:09:14 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

Some sort of quick change in your posting, hey Mark.??????? What happened to all that proof of yours that you said you delivered proving successful superior trading can be done with the trusts. Suddenly its all gone. I start to reply and suddenly the posting has changed and markedly so. ?????????

To: mark calgary who wrote (4195)	9/13/2002 11:33:23 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Peter it is so sad to see you argue with such vengance against people that you share a common interest with - ie. the trusts. Perhaps we should all view this link and take it to heart - YOU ESPECIALLY !!!! Apologies to all in advance, this is not meant to be a putdown of those pictured, just a wakeup call. --------- Perhaps it would be best to direct that to the person who started the argument in the first place as the following link will clearly show----- So while I was having a discussion with a handbag ,trust related, Lorne ,pops in with this ------ siliconinvestor.com