Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (20835)	9/14/2002 10:39:37 AM
From: Poet	Respond to of 21057

Yes, that's the impression I got from his post. And God only knows, RD is on the fringe, deliberately provocative and loves offending people, but if that were grounds for booting folks off SI, Beanies would be closed forever. -g

To: Ish who wrote (20835)	9/14/2002 11:07:31 AM
From: E	Respond to of 21057

Oh, I remember that stupid, tasteless post, and it was exactly as you describe. Designed to rile the susceptible; but it doesn't "claim" what JLA said it did. As you say, RD said he traded against them and they weren't innocent, meaning they were tough traders. He didn't say they deserved to die their horrible deaths. This reminds me of the non-existent-bomb-threat. Nobody could post that threat, and nobody will be able to post Duray's "claim" "that the people who died in the towers deserved their horrible deaths....." because there was no bomb threat, and no one made such a "claim."