SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (43892)9/14/2002 1:49:09 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
just been looking at the bullet pock marks on the building. Is this what passes for accuracy these days? Standards are lowering. In the past all shots would have gone inside the windows even at 600 yds.

I hadn't realized that Pakistani policemen had such reputations as marksmen.



To: maceng2 who wrote (43892)9/15/2002 2:41:34 AM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Pearly_Button; Re: "Just been looking at the bullet pock marks on the building. Is this what passes for accuracy these days?"

The US in Vietnam used how many thousands of rounds per enemy casualty? I think it was something like 100,000. That's a lot of holes.

-- Carl


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News