To: que seria who wrote (4958 ) 9/15/2002 10:20:57 PM From: ms.smartest.person Respond to of 39344 Actual Crisis Needed For Gold To Break Higher Based upon supply/demand fundamentals, which vary from information source to information source (i.e. World Gold Council, Gold Fields, and others), gold is a screaming buy. After all, since 1987, or when Gold Fields estimated that supply and demand were at equilibrium, annual demand has been above demand every year. That said, the gold market is not entirely driven by the demand versus production supply stats alone. Rather, central banks sales and producer hedging are equally important factors to consider. With this in mind, 3 factors that have been working in gold’s favor since late 2001 are as follows: 1) The continued reduction of producer hedge books (“The global gold producer hedge book contracted by a net 147 tonnes during 2001, the second consecutive annual decline in outstanding positions and a far greater fall than the 15 tonnes recorded in 2000.” Goldfields) 2) The first decline since 1993 in Central Banks lending (for 2001). 3) The return of gold’s ‘safe haven’ status -- ‘investor demand’ was up 36% in 1Q02 (125.6 tonnes). WGC. Some would also point out that the gold rally has been facilitated by the inability of central banks to manipulate the POG. However, this topic has been discussed before, and need not be rehashed at this time. With improving fundaments the long-term outlook for gold continues to brighten. However, what should also be considered is the fact that higher prices ‘could’ bring about an increase in production. And although this theory is untested since gold has been in the doldrums for 20-years, two counter points to the points above would read as follows: 1) Gold is rallying while production costs are scratching 15-year lows (average cash cost of $176/oz in 2001, down $11 from 2000). These two factors could help more production come online. 2) Companies that previous made great efforts to generate profits from their hedge book may not have been inclined to dig up every ounce of gold possible and/or vigorously tried to expand reserves (profits were generated in the hedges – in some cases as bets against a rising price of gold). With the reduction of hedging activities more production could come online. In sum, while the reduction in hedge books and central bank sales are reason for investor enthusiasm, they do not guarantee a continued rally in the POG. Rather, the reduction in the immediate supply of gold, which has helped send prices higher, has also served to curb demand in key regions (India), and spawn longer term production questions. Concerns over central bank sales/manipulation remain as well. Near Term Outlook & Conclusions A new trading top (#3) was recently formed at $324.90 an ounce (September 9, 02 ~ October contract). As suggested back in May, ‘gold could retest $300 an ounce or head above $350 an ounce by September’. Given that gold retested $300 an ounce and quickly rebounded (August 1) this is bullish indicator. However, that gold has failed to recapture its previous highs and/or attract much U.S. investor attention could hinder further immediate gains from developing. On the topic of ‘demand’, what should be remembered is that strong demand for gold in Japan did not arrive overnight. Rather, Japanese demand has recently increased following more than a decade of sinking real estate prices and an 18-year decline on the Nikkei. Quite frankly, Japanese buyers, worried about an economic crisis following the adoption of new banking laws (March 31, 02), finally said enough is enough - they moved into gold (similar fears may not arise in the U.S. for some time and/or until Treasury yields/U.S. dollar drop(s) significantly further) The difference between yesterday’s gold rallies and tomorrows may well be that gold reacts to a crisis rather than preemptively rallies expecting a crisis to develop. In such a reactionary rally (say following a stock market crash) investors would flee stocks, scoff at poorly yielding/risky bonds and head directly into gold. It is this type of rally that is needed for gold to propel to new bull market heights. That the July crash in U.S. equities did not send the POG higher confirms one thing: investors didn’t decide that enough was enough. Just as it took Japanese investors a decade to figure out that gold is a store of value (versus Yen), it may take American investors longer than a couple of years (or the length of the current bear market) to arrive at similar conclusions. That said, U.S. demand is still second only India and there have been some signals (increased excitement in gold stocks) that investors are learning of gold’s unique investment traits. Moreover, if an actual crisis does arrive (i.e. terrorism, Brazil, stock market crash, etc) this learning curve would surely be shortened. In sum, and to reconfirm by bias that the investor should own some gold (silver), I would rather buy gold at $300 an ounce rather than short gold at $330 ounce. Such is what the current trading range may represent -- a staging area for future gains. BWillett@fallstreet.com fallstreet.com