SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yaacov who wrote (17147)9/15/2002 3:48:30 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
White House: Can Fight Terror, Iraq
Sun Sep 15, 3:40 PM ET
By SCOTT LINDLAW, Associated Press Writer

URL: story.news.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration insisted Sunday that the U.S. military can simultaneously fight terrorism and confront Iraq, as White House officials said Congress and the United Nations ( news - web sites) must act quickly to show resolve against Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites).



Members of Congress, however, were split on whether it was wise to act within four weeks on an undefined resolution about Iraq, as Secretary of State Colin Powell ( news - web sites) called for. There were signs of a possible stalemate before the midterm congressional elections in November.

"We don't know what this administration wants to do," Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle said on ABC's "This Week." He said President Bush ( news - web sites) had yet to ask for a resolution on Iraq. But Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice ( news - web sites), said: "Obviously, it is up to the Congress to offer resolutions, not to the administration."

Several leading lawmakers made clear they will consider such resolutions on their own timetable.

Daschle was noncommittal on whether Congress could pass such a resolution before Election Day, saying only that it was possible. Sen. John McCain ( news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., said it would help Bush if Congress acted before its planned mid-October recess.

Sen. John Kerry ( news, bio, voting record), D-Mass., said he agreed with that timetable, but added that the resolution should not necessarily authorize force against Iraq.

He said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that he preferred "something that could get 100-to-nothing vote, something that says to the United Nations, look, we are really serious about this and we're all behind the effort to try to seek a consensus on dealing with Saddam Hussein."

On the diplomatic front, Powell said he hoped that intensive work on drafting a resolution for the Security Council could begin by the end of this week. He was optimistic about a vote by the Security Council within a few weeks.

The measure should give the Iraqi president "a matter of weeks" to comply with long-standing U.N. resolutions on his weapons program, Powell said.

He met with council members last week to win support for a tough resolution and planned to return to New York on Monday to resume the effort.

Powell and Rice declined to answer other specific questions about what should be in the resolution. But both said that new resolutions would not permit any negotiations with Saddam.

"The time for Iraq to respond was years ago," Powell said.

Some lawmakers, including Daschle, D-S.D., have questioned whether war with Iraq would undermine the hunt for al-Qaida terrorists behind the Sept. 11 attacks.

"We fully believe that the United States is capable of conducing the war on terrorism and dealing with other threats," Rice said on ABC. "We don't believe there are limits on what we can do in the war on terrorism and dealing with a major threat of weapons of mass destruction."

But Sen. Bob Graham ( news, bio, voting record), D-Fla., said on "Fox News Sunday" that Saddam is "not one of the primary threats to the United States."

Pointing to the arrests of five men who allegedly belonged to a terror cell near Buffalo, N.Y., Graham said, "What worries me is that I think the war on terrorism has bogged down."

"Why were those five people arrested in Buffalo? Primarily because we had evidence that they had been at an al-Qaida training camp in 2001," said Graham, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "Those camps, in my judgment, are the real threat to the United States security, and that's what I think our priority ought to be, in terms of protecting the people America, is taking them out."

Graham also said Bush should warn Iran, just as he has warned Iraq, against helping terrorists.

He echoed administration fears that Iran is tied to the terror group Hezbollah — "the A Team of international terrorism," Graham said.



To: Yaacov who wrote (17147)9/15/2002 5:01:45 PM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
OIL I doubt there is any problem on oil business between sr and jr Bush or Saudi. We already have a commitment from Saudi to increase oil supply should prices get out of hand if a war... today Saudi says we can use the air fields if U.N. goes along with war.

Saudi big surprise is how much money they have given to terrorists and the nuts who run these radical schools. They attempted to pay for peace in their nation .. I doubt, after the Iraq regime is brought down , Saudi , Iran, Syria, etc will ever be the same... It will not happen over night but Iraq is the start of change in the Region.
The point of the oil article is Iraq oil will pay to bring about regime change. Expect the oil will also pay for our expenses as well... We will also make sure France and Russia are kept hole on their investments in order to get them to go along with the vote in UN. imo