Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (57968)	9/15/2002 3:55:01 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Are you sure he isn't opposed to Sadaam? Because I thought he was. I merely thought he didn't think our policies were sound, that we were hurting the Iraqi people, and that our current course of action was misguided. I didn't get the feeling he thought Sadaam was a good leader, that he approved of Sadaam, or that he was an "ally" of Sadaam. Do you have anything in print saying Ritter does not oppose Sadaam? Of course opposing and DEposing are two different things. Right? I did get the feeling he thought we didn't have any business deciding how Iraq should be governed- a viewpoint I happen to share. The internal workings of other nations are their private business. If they DO something outside their borders to another country (the invasion of Kuwait, for example) the world community may decide to unite and intervene. For the US to decide who might IN THE FUTURE pose a risk and eliminate them before they do, smacks of Minority Report minus the mind reading capability.