Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: reaper who wrote (53468)	9/16/2002 10:34:46 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Is sears a new addition? Last we talked you did not see it as a GTZ. M

To: reaper who wrote (53468)	9/18/2002 5:15:55 PM
From: ild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

RE: Falling 'bastions' of American Business. Is SBC in much worse shape than other baby bells?

To: reaper who wrote (53468)	9/18/2002 5:35:13 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 209892

>>losing money and doing a 30% dilutive equity deal through a relative unknown investment bank is good news right<< what amazes me is they find buyers for this stuff ... We had a car loan "security" (ponzi) outfit locally here lose a few hundred million of folks money when it got investigated by state securities folks -- now burned investors are lining up to get equity in the new company hoping to get more than .02 on the dollar if all goes well -- dumb, dumb, dumb -- even that they would be allowed to do such a thing after perpetrating the fraud that they have -- UB!! You should have seen the ads in the paper advertising this stuff (my Dad got out right before they imploded) -- it sounded just a little bit riskier than a CD (except for the additional 4-5% they were paying, of course). They were insured against losses in the loan portfolio ... what a friggin' crock.