Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (44683)	9/17/2002 2:26:37 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There is the thorny question about Saddams own civilian population. Will the "no fly zones" be lifted. Is this what Carl meant by the UN not allowing Saddam to kill 100's of thousands of people? The "no fly zones" were put there to prevent Saddam attacking his own people.

To: kumar who wrote (44683)	9/17/2002 3:17:33 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

the administration does not care So you think it is "1,2,3,4, we really want to go to war?" Naah. There is no "Blood Lust" there. The administration would love to have Saddam totally comply, or be kicked out. But they are though messing with him. No more "Dissing" by him will be allowed. If we have learned anything from our actions this last year, we should have learned that you have to make these people believe you really will kick their A** if they don't comply. Otherwise, we are wasting our time, and they will take our weakness as a signal to take even further action against us.